Frank Gehry - Lou Ruvo Center, Las Vegas

Le Corbusier - Habitation

http://www.greatbuildings.com/buildings/Unite_d_Habitation.html

Michael Rakowitz - ParaSITES

http://michaelrakowitz.com/projects/parasite/

John Peto

Demakersvan - Cinderella table

Liv Blavarp

http://www.charonkransenarts.com/artists/Blavarp_6_2005/artist_blavarp.html

Influence Images

Influences

Audience

Berlin Iron


"This 'new' type of art looks at social reality as a dynamic flux, a moving network of rules/morals and social groupings/alliances that changes and responds to itself. The art in question draws viewers into a focused space to experience this reality, to question/change it and to integrate it into their understanding of self-in-context to the larger social reality." (Art and audience extra reading, first page)

- I found it ironic to find that 'gift' in German means poison, after looking at the Berlin Iron. Which was first used for the Napoleonic wars and then was an exchange for Hitler's cause.

- In these terms, jewelry is a perfect vehicle to question both the inner/private life and its position in the larger public sphere. Jewelry as souvenir, ownership, alliance, physical protection, and spectacle. It is an object that is owned privately, but displayed publicly, meant to be noticed and admired or respected as the Berlin Iron was.

- What happens when an object is a well-crafted simulacra of the jewel, as Kivarkis' work, does the piece signify the same importance and wealth?

- As is later stated in the article with the giving of objects comes an obligatory reciprocity. For jewelry the engagement ring is a great signifier, once given, ownership, marriage and sex was expected, was obligatory.
- Does 'the implication of pleasure as a motive' still ring true in jewelry? In art?

The article also states that the act of giving is seen as altruistic and without ties. In relation to Kandinsky's statement about the artist - "He must realize that his every deed, feeling, and thought are raw but sure material from which his work is to arise, that he is free in art but not in life." (38) Is the artist giving work to society, themself, their field, what is the relationship between artist and society. Give and take, take and take, give and give . . . ?




Doris Betz



Vera Siemund





Anya Kivarkis






Lola Brooks

Spirituality

"The new harmony demands that the inner value of a picture should remain unified whatever th variations or contrasts of outward form or colour." (Kandinsky, 34) Does this inner unification come through construction? How does construction speak to the inner workings of the soul? The soul seems like an inutitve thing, not one that works as a ladder or a mathematical equation, (
though buddhist imagery shows the change and rise the spiritually enlightened black elephant to a white elephant as a map)

"The spectator is too ready for a meaning in a picture." (Kandinsky, 35) We've become a critical culture. Is it really that the expectation is for a viewer to find meaning in an art piece, or that as a culture we expectat there will be meaning in a piece?

"We stand and gaze fascinated, till of a sudden the explanation bursts suddenly upon us. It is the conviction that nothing mysterious can ever happen in our everyday life that has destroyed the joy of abstract thought." (Kandinsky, 35).

- Does the disillusionment of the unknown expand or diminsh the spiritual?

- Does ullison heighten our sense of reality?

- Ths elitist, cerebral making seems to expect nothing and everything.

"We may be present at the conception of a new great epoch, or we may see the opportunity squandered in aimless extravagance." (Kandinsky 36)

- What has either prediction occured since then? Contemporary examples?

Did Kandinsky succeed in speaking to the inner and not the outer feelings and influences?




Populus Tremula, 2003, Mark Wallinger
A bare aspen with 500, mass produced, lightly scented rosaries



Iris Eichenberg

Art and it's Institutions

Hans Haacke



The Boardroom, 1987, Antoni Muntadas

Can and is the Institution ever not connected with a monetary purpose or goal?

How has globalization altered the institution?

Globalism

Santiago Sierra



Juan Munoz



Andreas Gursky

I understand the cultural restrictions globalism has lifted. People now embrace there heritage whether from Estonia or Dubai. In fact it seems in the current art world to be American or European is boring, not enough flavor. In the art world, is there much cultural american pride?
As a country that is made up of hundreds of origins, can we really have a profound cultural base or just a specific way of life we are accustomed to?

Please look at February 28th's post of Kimsooja's video.

Does globalism, precisely because of its long reach, allow a viable alternative to violent action and open the doors to peaceful protest that will be heard? ex. Eugenio Dittborn and Cildo Meireles Or is that still a fairy tale?

If a person is restricted from leaving their country, is the internet sufficient in truly letting them engage and discover other lands and cultures? How much can a computer screen fill in for real life? (I realize this is a very privilege question to be asking)

Lee - " This 'atmosphere compounded of artistic theories' must be ready for the day when the art world's traditional borders are indivisible from those of the global order we are inclined merely to portray."
From Lee's statement above, if the borders between the art world and the 'real' world are indivisible, how will or can art be avante garde?

What does Contemporary Jewelry Mean? by Benjamin Lignel

http://www.grayareasymposium.org/jewellery/en/

Art, the Body and Identity

The total situation of art making, both in terms of the development of the art maker and in the nature and quality of the work of art itself, occur in a social situation, are integral elements of this social structure, and are mediated and determined by specific and definable social institutions, be they art academies, systems of patronage, mythologies of the divine creator, artist as he-man or social outcast. - Linda Nochlin






Barbara Kruger






Ana Mendieta






Orlan

Is there a difference between body art and adornment?

Can the figure still represent the idea of beauty?

What does the body represent outside of the sexual sphere?

What cultural representations does the body hold outside of sexuality?

Can the body be present without political significance?

Can the body ever be neutral? And if so, how?

In it’s absence can the body still be present? (ex. Barbara Kruger)

Can the body be separate from identity?

In every instance, women artists and writers would seem to be closer to other artists and writers of their own period and outlook than they are to each other.

Identity, is there a distinct line between gender and time period?
-bumper sticker: Well- behaved women seldom make history

Thus the question of women's equality--in art as in any other realm--devolves not upon the relative benevolence or ill-will of individual men, nor the self-confidence or abjectness of individual women, but rather on the very nature of our institutional structures themselves and the view of reality which they impose on the human beings who are part of them. As John Stuart Mill pointed out more than a century ago: "Everything which is usual appears natural. The subjection of women to men being a universal custom, any departure from it quite naturally appears unnatural . . . . unlike other oppressed groups or castes, men demand of them not only submission but unqualified affection as well; thus women are often weakened by the internalized demands of the male-dominated society itself, as well as by a plethora of material goods and comforts: the middle-class woman has a great deal more to lose than her chains. - Linda Nochlin .

Post-humanism

Patricia Piccinini



Alexis Rockman



Lee Bul






Rebecca Horn

As organisms that experience the everyday in our flesh and blood bodies, what would happen to our existence and comprehension of the day to day if that was suddenly taken away? Would there be a day to day?

Most specifically, what, if any, emotion would remain?
- What and is there a quality of life if outside of the cerebral, emotion is extinct?

Does strengthening and improving the function of our mind equate to better quality of life?

With the tuning and perfecting of physical precision, does a more peaceful or violent society follow?

With the ever growing gap of socio-economic groups, what determinate would the pervasive use of trans-humanism cause to an already shaken, biased, and volatile, homo sapien community?